Dianthus anatolicus

Dianthus anatolicus, or Anatolian pink, belongs to the Caryophyllaceae family. Kew lists Türkiye as its native range. Other sources describe a wider range reaching the western Himalayas. Plants For A Future also lists nearby parts of Asia and Greek islands. These sources do not fully agree on its range. Himalayan records place it at 7,874–9,843 feet [2,400–3,000 metres]. Kew classes it as a subshrub of temperate regions.

In gardens, this plant forms a low mound or mat. The RHS describes it as an evergreen perennial. Small green leaves make dense cushions that spread across the ground. Its garden height is about 0.3–1.6 feet [0.1–0.5 metres]. Its spread falls within the same range. Plants take two to five years to reach full size. Single flowers rise above the leaves in spring and summer. Their petals are white or pale pink. The foliage stays green through the year, beyond the flowering season.

Give this pink full sun and soil that drains well. It suits neutral or alkaline soil rather than acid ground. The RHS lists chalk, loam and sand as suitable soils. It accepts conditions ranging from dry to moist. Both exposed and sheltered sites suit it. East-, south- and west-facing sites appear in the RHS guidance. Its UK hardiness rating is H6, covering cold down to about −20°C. Plants For A Future lists USDA zones 5–9.

Its low form suits rock gardens, gravel beds and alpine troughs. The RHS also lists patio pots and other containers. Plants For A Future records its use in planted beds. That source also notes value for wildlife. Remove spent flowers as needed. Sow seed or divide plants in spring to raise more. In summer, take cuttings from shoots that lack flowers. These methods offer several ways to increase a planting.

Slugs and aphids may attack this species. Possible diseases include powdery mildew, rust, viral disease and fusarium wilt. The RHS warns of skin allergy in people and pets. Wear gloves and other protective clothing when handling it. Plants For A Future lists no known edible use. It records a traditional use for fevers that recur. That record does not establish safety or effectiveness. Its report of no known hazards conflicts with the RHS warning.